Case Study – London NHS Project

Transforming Mental Health Care: Insights from the NHS Pilot Project

In July 2025, an innovative three-day training programme was delivered to healthcare professionals at an NHS Foundation Trust in London, focusing on de-escalation, trauma-informed care, and patient-centered communication. The comprehensive report reveals not only the success of this alternative approach but also highlights significant gaps in traditional training methods. This article explores the key findings and implications of this groundbreaking pilot project.

The Challenge in Mental Health Settings

Mental health care professionals face unique challenges when managing escalating situations. Traditional Prevention and Management of Violence and Aggression (PMVA) training has often prioritized physical intervention techniques over communication strategies. As one participant in the pilot programme noted, “PMVA doesn’t really do de-escalation. It just does the physical side,” while another pointed out that “No one ever taught us how to talk to someone with psychosis.”

These limitations have created a skills gap among frontline staff, who often find themselves inadequately prepared to handle complex situations involving distressed patients. The pilot project sought to address this gap by offering a comprehensive, trauma-informed approach to de-escalation.

The Power of Lived Experience

Perhaps the most impactful element of the training was the inclusion of a lived experience expert. Participants consistently emphasized how hearing directly from a service user transformed their understanding of restraint and escalation. This human perspective allowed staff to see beyond problematic behaviors and recognize underlying needs, fostering a more empathetic approach to care.

One participant reflected, “Sean gave us the insight of what happened and how [the patient] feels if they get into restraint when they are not heard… I feel like that was information for us – to be aware of what we do.” This perspective shift represents a fundamental change in how staff perceive challenging behaviors.

Key Components of the Alternative Approach

The training program delivered several innovative components that participants found particularly valuable:

Practical Communication Tools: The “Universal Greeting” provided staff with a structured format for introducing themselves and establishing rapport, while the “Treat People Right” concept offered a memorable framework for respectful engagement.
Scenario-Based Learning: Unscripted, realistic scenarios helped staff practice de-escalation techniques in a psychologically safe environment, solidifying theoretical knowledge through practical application.
Behavioral Analysis Tools: The ABC chart (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence) offered a structured approach to incident analysis, helping staff identify triggers and patterns rather than focusing solely on the incident itself.
Clear Legal and Ethical Frameworks: The training clarified when and why force may be used, addressing misconceptions particularly among newer or junior staff regarding their rights and responsibilities.
Reflective Practice: Models for after-incident debriefing supported team learning and emotional wellbeing, marking a shift toward psychological safety and post-incident growth.

Impact on Staff Confidence and Practice

The programme received an impressive Net Promoter Score of 9.7, with participants reporting significant changes in their confidence and approach to challenging situations. A Matron from a PICU ward commented: “Well taught and evidence based. I think this training would work best if offered to all front line staff to improve knowledge and confidence and reduce incident, injury and burnout as well as improving the patient experience significantly.”

Participants consistently expressed that the training would change their practice. The strongest impact areas included use of language and tone, reflection and documentation practices, approaches to reducing unnecessary restraint, and growth in emotional literacy and resilience.

Addressing Organizational Challenges

Beyond individual skill development, the pilot project highlighted several organizational challenges that need addressing:

Cultural and Role-Based Variability: Participants noted significant differences in confidence and practice across roles and cultural backgrounds, suggesting a need for standardized training across all staff levels.
Support Worker Preparation: Several participants highlighted that support workers, who often lead on interventions, frequently feel underprepared: “Support workers haven’t had enough support. Some aren’t confident entering a room and saying what needs to be said.”
Staff Wellbeing: The training emphasized the importance of staff psychological safety and self-care, with participants recognizing that “We tend to put patients first and forget about ourselves.”

The Business Case for Change

The report makes a compelling business case for reconsidering traditional training approaches. Effective de-escalation leads to fewer violent incidents, resulting in reduced staff injury, less sick leave, and lower associated costs. Staff who feel confident in handling challenging situations are more likely to remain in their roles, reducing recruitment and training expenses.

Additionally, trauma-informed, patient-centered approaches lead to improved therapeutic relationships and potentially shorter inpatient stays. Trusts that prioritize non-physical intervention strategies align with contemporary care standards and may experience enhanced reputation among patients, families, and the broader healthcare community.

Recommendations for Mental Health Services

Based on the pilot’s findings, the report offers several key recommendations:

Broaden Training Scope: Redesign learning pathways to integrate comprehensive non-physical elements—especially verbal de-escalation, persuasion, empathy, and patient insight.
Target Wider Staff Base: Prioritize training for all frontline staff, especially support workers and nurses, who often lead interventions but report feeling underprepared.
Enhance Confidence and Culture: Use training to foster confidence and establish a shared language across departments, addressing cultural variance in de-escalation practice.
Embed Follow-On Resources: Support post-training reinforcement through accessible tools such as reference cards, short videos, and brief team-based exercises.
Consider Replacing Current Training: For many staff, the core skills needed to prevent restraint—empathy, persuasion, calm leadership—are inadequately taught elsewhere. This pilot could become the new gold standard.

Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health Care

The NHS Mental Health Trust Pilot Project represents more than just an alternative training approach—it signals a fundamental shift in how we conceptualize care in challenging circumstances. By prioritizing communication, empathy, and trauma-informed approaches over physical intervention, the pilot offers a blueprint for more humane and effective mental health care.

As one participant succinctly stated: “We’re not going there to fight. We’re going there to help… and this is what we’ve learned.” This simple yet profound shift in perspective encapsulates the transformative potential of this approach.

For mental health services seeking to improve patient outcomes while supporting staff wellbeing, investing in comprehensive, evidence-based de-escalation training represents not just a practical necessity but an ethical imperative. The pilot demonstrates that with the right training, staff can lead with dignity and insight, transforming the experience of both providers and recipients of mental health care.

Guides

Download our Positive Handling starter guide for schools.

Contact Us

Ready to explore Positive Handling training for your staff team? Let’s talk today.